The editorial board met last week at the <i>Northwest Arkansas Times</i> to discuss the massive flood of a dozen or so angry e-mails. A little background: The controversy was sparked by two of Art Hobson’s recent columns in which he said that Christian fundamentalism was, after all, not nearly as bad as Islamic fundamentalism.
This ticked off Christians right and left. Moderate Christians objected being compared to Islamic fundamentalists. Fundamentalist Christians objected to being compared unfavorably to Islamic fundamentalists, tactically speaking. No one, except Art, objected to being compared to fundamentalist Christians. Muslims didn’t say anything at all.
So, let’s try to imagine what was going through the editorial board’s mind last week:
“Look at all these e-mails from readers mad at Art Hobson!”, said the board chairman. “Let’s not get these people too mad at us. What would appease them?”
“We’ve got religious writers and church schedules. We print Billy Graham. What else do they want?” said the marketing director. “Let’s read these letters again. What stands out about the complaining people? It’s not their faith–you can find faith all sorts of places. It’s not their religion. But something…”
“Carswell!” cries the oldest editor.
“Who?”
“G. Harrold Carswell, a Nixon Supreme Court nominee, failed to win confirmation. Why? Senator Roman Hruska said in his defense, ‘Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they, and a little chance?’ He wasn’t confirmed because he wasn’t too smart.”
“I don’t see where you’re going with this,” said the chairman.
“No, I think I get it,” said the sports guy. “You want us to add a columnist to balance Hobson, someone who speaks to those same people, someone like them.”
“Exactly!” said the marketing director, continuing in unison with the sports guy, “Someone dumb!”
The chairman was silent for a moment. “You mean, someone so stupid, so ignorant, as to balance someone smart and knowledgeable?”
“Yes, that sounds just about right,” said the marketing director.
And so, ladies and gentlemen, I give you Brandon Champagne.
Discussion Question: Is the Times simply living up to its reputation as the World’s Worst Daily Newspaper? Or is Hussman ownership a factor? Yes, it’s hard to imagine the Times getting worse, but it’s also hard to imagine Hussman ownership not corrupting whatever it grasps. Think of the Times as immovable object and Hussman as irresistable force.
One could wish they’d tear each other up a bit, but one would probably be hoping in vain.