Arkansawyer

June 29, 2007

Blogroll additions

Filed under: Parenting, Science — John A Arkansawyer @ 9:41 pm

I’ve got two I just learned about today. I’m posting them more or less sight unseen.

The first is a group blog, theinferior4+1, which includes Lucius Shepard, who wrote one of my favorite books of the eighties, Life During Wartime, an absolutely brilliant novel.

The second is kind of a metablog–it’s a page listing blog postings by Gar Lipow, who wrote Cooling It! No Hair Shirt Solutions to Global Warming.

Why these two together? I found the first via a posting by Gar at Making Light. Since I’ve given them a lot of link love lately, Gar gets the pointer this time around.

Upcoming Event: Robert A. Heinlein Centennial

Filed under: In Memoriam, Science — John A Arkansawyer @ 9:25 pm

This is where we’ll be next week, July 6 through 8:

Heinlein Centennial web site

It was a difficult decision to attend. My family reunion on my mom’s side is that same weekend in Newton County, but my parents aren’t going to make the trip, and I saw all the folks there in March, and I’ll see them again at the start of deer season. Besides, there’s only one Heinlein Centennial, ever. Now all I have to do is acquire a tuxedo for the gala dinner.

June 28, 2007

A Game Of Blue

Filed under: Music, Science — John A Arkansawyer @ 9:57 pm

It’s not The Dreaming, but it might be a dream: Remembering 7th Street–The Oakland Jazz & Blues Clubs Virtual Reality Project:

Famous blues and jazz musicians Lowell Fulson, Saunders King, Sugar Pie DeSanto and many others played at hotspots like Slim Jenkins Place, Esther’s Orbit Room, John Singer’s and Harvey’s Rex Club.

Railroad workers, especially members of the International Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, the nation’s first black union that had an office on 7th Street, would distribute records cut by black musicians across the country.

It was a remarkable part of the city’s history that today has been all but lost to urban redevelopment and urban decay.

Now the area is being brought back to life in a joint project of the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and School of Architecture that is using a video game program to let people experience again what the clubs were like and learn the story of Oakland’s jazz and blues scene.

An eight-block stretch of 7th Street is being recreated as a virtual world, which people can access over the Internet and adopt avatar figures to walk up and down the streets, enter the clubs, hear the music of the era and interact with other people logged onto the site.

(via O’Reilly Radar)

How Municipal Wi-Fi Ruins Your Eyes, Grows Hair On The Palms Of Your Hands, And Makes Baby Jesus Cry

Filed under: Arkansas, Church, Humor, Science — John A Arkansawyer @ 9:12 pm

Why shouldn’t Fayetteville residents be up in arms about the health effects of municipal wi-fi?

This is just a guess, but could it be that there aren’t any health effects, and that sensible people know that?

No, too easy. Too simple. Too obvious. Now the Truth can be Told: Municipal Wi-Fi leads to sex.

Yes, you heard right: S-E-X. Did you really think all those people staring at their filthy computer screens were engaged in something wholesome? No, no–that’s not a laptop. That’s a lap top dance! Those people are reading pornographic Kirk/Spock fan fiction, engaging in salacious chat, and setting assignations with the other members of their multisexual Jane Austen e-mail discussion groups. Why do you think they keep going off to the bathroom? Do you really think those cheap perverts pay for more than one cup of coffee? And if they are going there to pee–well, let’s just not think about that.

Why, right now as I type (in public, shameless hussy that I am), there’s a woman sitting just to my right, also typing. Her shirt even has the word “sexual” on it. For all I know, she’s the man I’m having hot chat room sex with right now. Um, I need to go to the bathroom. brb


Okay, but seriously? Wi-Fi doesn’t have any known harmful health effects.What it can have is a liberating effect. It’s not that different from moving to the city. There are more people there, in a more diverse population. You can live your life in the way that pleases you, mostly, and if someone thinks you’re a weirdo, well, you can probably arrange to never see them again if you don’t want to.You think there aren’t people who think this is a bad idea? Think again. Earlier this month, there was a letter to the editor in a northewst Arkansas publication objecting to installing a cell phone tower on a church. Why? Well, here’s a bit from a similar story on Minnesota Public Radio’s Marketplace:

The congregation of St Peter and St Paul Church in North London worship at an open-air ceremony. The church’s vicar wanted to have a cell phone mast installed in his steeple, but some parishioners objected. The matter was referred to an ecclesiastical court — and, says Jonathan Petre, the judge made an unexpected ruling.

PETRE: He said pornography can be transmitted through mobile phones and that the Church’s mission was to promote the Church’s work. Putting up mobile phone masts which could transmit pornography was outside that legal remit.

[SOUND: Bells]

Yes, the judge decided that while the church bells were summoning the faithful to prayer, the cell phone mast inside the tower might be conveying a set of rather different signals.

SEX PHONE OPERATOR: You have called the filthiest and most explicit telephone sex service in the U.K. I must warn you that if you are easily offended by explicit adult material, you must hang up now.

[SOUND: Hang-up]

The judge said that the original concept of mobile phones was totally innocent, but they could now be used to download vast quantities of obscene material. He banned St. Peter and St. Paul from installing the mast.

Now, if the cell phone tower is analogous to someone’s longtime companion, municipal Wi-Fi is a common streetwalker. Like I said, it grows hair on the palms of your hands and makes the baby Jesus cry. (I made up the part about it ruining your eyes, though. Everyone knows you can enlarge the text of your porn as large as you need it.)

The Drive-By Truckers Discuss The Little Rock School Board Controversy

Filed under: Arkansas, Education, Music, Parenting — John A Arkansawyer @ 1:45 pm


Now, he said he was the best friend a black man from Alabama ever had,
And I have to admit, compared to Fob James, George Wallace don’t seem that bad
And if it’s true that he wasn’t a racist and he just did all them things for the votes
I guess Hell’s just the place for “kiss ass politicians” who pander to assholes.

Blogroll addition and bonus link

Filed under: Arkansas, Church, Education, Gender, Parenting — John A Arkansawyer @ 1:41 pm

Today’s addition is Dr. Kimbrough’s weBLOG, from Dr. Walter Kimbrough, president of Philander Smith College. Dr. Kimbrough recently wrote a cry for justice in the feisty Inside Higher Ed, which was much discussed at the also-feisty Arkansas Blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

And so I read with my general sense of despair as another billionaire gives millions to a university that serves a population that looks nothing like America presently or in the future, economically or racially. Politicians heap praises for these gifts from the wealthy to the wealthy while the vast majority of their constituents will never benefit from these acts. They’re too busy working three jobs and sending their kids to substandard elementary and high schools that will ensure they never go to places like Columbia.

Read it all–it’s worth your time.

By the way, if you’re involved in or concerned about higher education, you ought to read Inside Higher Ed. Here’s a bonus link from today: ‘Dude, You’re a Fag’. The teaser:

Colleges may have anti-bias policies, gay studies, and plenty of out gay people, but they also have a lot of young men who have learned to be homophobic, writes C.J. Pascoe.

And an excerpt:

Two years ago a student reminded me about the way in which the fag discourse might color students’ understandings of what they learn in college classrooms. During my senior seminar entitled “Masculinities,” Bradley, a former Marine and football player, continually sat back of the classroom arms folded defiantly, sneering at students’ attempts at sociological analyses of inequality. As a result, I found my self surprised when he visited my office hours. Apparently inspired by a piece on the social construction of gender in childhood, Bradley poked his head in to my office asking, “You got a sec, teach?” I said “Sure,” taken aback that after his angry outbursts in class he wanted to speak with me.

As he folded himself in to what now seemed a ridiculously small chair he asked, “Teach, now, I have no problem raising a girl to be tough, but what am I gonna do if my son wants to play with Barbie dolls?” I couldn’t answer before he began to tell a story of childhood gender socialization. “You see,” he told me, “when I was little I loved playing with Barbies. My sister, she always told me to put ‘em away. One day she got so fed up she dragged me outside and shoved Barbies in all my pockets and made me stand there while my friends laughed at me.” We spent the next hour discussing a sociological analysis of his experience, how boys have to deny femininity and weakness or suffer teasing and harassment. Bradley, in this instance, serves as a classic example of the legacy of the fag discourse, the way in which some young men might come to class shaped by negative memories of gendered norms. Like some other young men in my classes, Bradley learned early in life to renounce femininity and stereotypically feminine interests or suffer ridicule.

June 27, 2007

Live Blogging: Katherine Mitchell at the Fred Darragh Center for Intellectual Freedom

Filed under: Arkansas, Church, Education, Gender, Parenting — John A Arkansawyer @ 11:55 am

A serendipitous venue, don’t you think?

There’s a fair crowd, and also some journalists. Whether they’re fair or not, well, we’ll see.

Bobby Roberts, library director, is giving the introduction with some words about Fred Darragh, who said he’d like to have a little controversy here now and then. That got a good laugh from the audience. He also notes Katherine Mitchell was on the library board that hired him.

Now Steve Ronell, chairman of the Political Animals Club, announces the next meeting, August 9, at the Governor’s Mansion, with Mack McLarty. He notes the presence of Dennis <last name> who brought Dr. Mitchell to this meeting. In attendance are various elected officials, beginning with Dr. Mitchell.

Mary Lou <I didn’t catchthe rest>

Fred Allen, District 33 State Representative

Melanie Fox, Little Rock School Board

Pat O’Brien, Pulaski County Circuit Court Clerk

Larry Berkley, Little Rock School Board

Wendell Griffen, Arkansas Court of Appeals Judge

Steve Harrelson, District 1 State Representative

Dr. Mitchell: I was advised not to let the Arkansas Democrat (note that she did not mention the Gazette half) define me–that I should tell you who I am. (Applause, some laughter). She notes her forebear, her English teacher from Dunbar High, who lost her job challenging the school system for equal pay. (She was later restored to her job by the Court of Appeals.) I am not here to beat up on anyone–I believe in the Golden Rule, and in a good education for all children.

I need to make a statement regarding the allegations about me: It has been usggested that I hvae compromised by postions as a board member without getting the board’s permiission for that action. I am making this statement to inform the public of my position. I am an employee of a private college where I teach education students. My conly contract is with them. I have never been employeed by the LRSD. In 2005, it appears that an agreement was reasched by the LRSD, the Ark. Dept of Edcuation, and various colleged for alternative licensure. Philander Smith was the host for that program in 2005. Students in that program included LRSD employees and others. The LRSD was the custodian of funds, and not the hiring authority. This was approved by Roy Brooks. If my particupation was viewed as inappropriate, then Mark McMillan or Dr. Brooks would have made it know. As custodians of the district, I would expect them to make the board aware of these issues. If there was a problem, it should have been rasied at the time, not two years later. It has been suggested that race played a part in locating the program at Philander Smith. The program, however, served a variety of people of various ethnic backgrounds. I have been mindful to operate within the law in all that I do. I have committed on crime, depsite theallegations and inferences to that effect. Since, thanks to Mr. Powers and the Democrat, this has become a matter of prosecutorial investigation, I have not other statement to make.

{Arkansawyer} I believe I see why some dislike her so–she is poised and dignified under these stressful conditions.

At the time that Dr. Mitchell become board president, she received a report on the positions being cut by Dr. Brooks. These were positions needed for education. The ratio of black/white pay cuts was roughtly $900k/$28k. The people who made these decisions were cabinet-level–people at ground level were not given inputinto the process.

I tried to engage with Dr Brooks, but it seems that what the community wanted didn’t matter to him. I also heard that he did not communicate with African-American parents. I did not have a problem with the reorganization per se, but with its implmentation.

In the last election, a black majority was elected to the board, and i think this troubled some people. In a democracy, the majorty rules–but that doesn’t mean that any children will not get a good education. We were told that the resources freed by the reorganization would be used to help educational acheivement, but we have not seen that happen.

The courts told us to

bring in outside experts to evaluation our programs and tell us what’s working. We have not yet done that, because we first must have staff development. We must begin making more data-based decisions. We also need to speak to the people tho work with children every day, and find out from them what they need to help those children.

We’vehave schools in West Little Rock which do not have reading programs. We have parents who have told us about their concerns–we need to be more sensitive to that.

She referenced this article in the <i>Washington Post</i>: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/26/AR2007062602339.htmlOur teachers

We need to focus on schools as the primary site of learning. We need to pay more attention to the measures we use and the resuts they bring.

Our teachers have not been appreciated–that will go a long way. Our business community needs to help us. I planned programs to bring parents more involved in their children’s eeducation (this got a small laugh). We have a lot of teachers who come and stay two, three, four years and decide this is not for them–we need to give them more support in their early years.

All of us have a stake in the education of our children. If we do not prepare them it is our fault if they cannot take over the functions of our society. There is a need to return to the traditions which came when we had respect for God. I encourage all parents in this district to establish firm and working relationships with your children’s teachers and priniciplas. I urge you to organize precinct by precinct to gain the power to make your politicians more responsive, to improve our community, rather than the interests of business and power brokers. We should come together in the interest of our children. We should not let one person or one act divide us, as we have allowed to happen. Student achievement, thebest performace our children can have, sh

ould be our focus. It’s not about any attitude I might have about the superintendent, but about seeing we have the people in place to make our children successful in their futuuerh lives–that’s my focal point. Many things have been said, including in today’s editorial aboutme. I am focused on providing a quality education for our children. We will all benefit by that.

Thank you.

Now the questions:

Q: When you have seven great minded people, you’re going to have conflict. When that conflict became so apparent over the Brooks issue, there was talk of a mdeiateor–what became of that?

A: It hasn’t gone anywhere yet. Once we get other things resolved, we;ll get to that. Onee thing–we have always disagreed. But now, because the disagreement is between a majority black school board and a mminority which was once in the majority, it’s become dificult. When Dr. Brooks was appointed, I supported Dr. HOlmes. When the majorityvote was in favor of Dr. Brooks, I recieved him. We didn’t raise Cain over it. I went to him and said I was willing to work with him. We havevoted along raciallines in certain situations, becasue we vote by our experiences. We all have opionins, htats all they are–none of us spit out facts. That’s how intelligent people function. If the majority ovtes in vaor of something, we have to accept that. I’vedone that for the 18 years I’ve been on the board.

Q: It’s neen the policiy of the board to bring s schhol to the underserved NW area. WIll you repaset atht commitment.

A: That is the unanimous policy of the board.

{Arkansawyer} I’m skipping people’s commentaries from the floor.

Q: Do you personally believe that the district is unitary, that’s it’s reached that legal bar? And while Judge Wilson ruled so, it’s been appeals–will you continue to direct your attorneys to follow that appeal, to agree that the district is unitary?

A: I don’t think we met the requirements for unitary status. The judge said, at first, that we had to embed out working programs into the curriculaum. I don’t think we’ve done that. The judge said we’d shown a good faith effort–the terms had changed. I’m in favor of doing whatever is necessary to help all our children acheive. As far as the appeal, we have to continue with it–our attorneys will have to fight it, unless Mr. Walker decides to drop it.

Q: There is disagreement witin the district. What have you thought about reconciliation and going forwared to accomplish the things you’ve talked about today, which which no one could disagree.

A: The board is not together. Some members don’t speak to each other. I can only say what I hope would happen–I think they vote their consciences, just as I do. Regardless of how we feel about each otehr personally.

Q: What percentage of youth, by race, are in AP classes? What percentage are in alternative schools–and what is an alternative school, exactly?

A: I’ll have to get those figuesres for the first questionl. The alternative schools are designed to provide a different route for children–but most of them of filled with children who “misbehave” in school. The only truly alternative school, in my opioni, we have is the Metropolitan, where we have the accelerated learning programs–the graduation rate is really high ther, and I’m proud of that program. But at Southwest, the majoirity of them are African-American males–the same at Franklin. I’m concerned that we don’t put the appropirate personnele in those school.

Q: Woul dyou share with us the thought process that went into the buyout, rather than airing the concerns you had about Dr. Brooks?

A: First, we were reperesnted by counsel, and his expereience led him to make the suggestiong to us to make the buyout. He indicated to us that it may be a long process, that D.rl Brooks attorney’s could keep appealing, and that two years later we might be in the same position. I got calls from scitizens encouraging that buyout.

Q: Could you say something about the process for finding a new superintendent?

A: The board will make a decisions about the process–in the past, we;’ve had a search firm submit resumes of applications, after they did the initioal screening. I don’t know what the board will do in this case. We will have to have an interim–this i snot a good time to do a search to have someone here for August. We’ll discuss this tonight at our board meeting. I want a superintendent who’s had some experience in an urban setting, who’s got good communication skills, and good leadership shills.

Q: Who have you talked to about the interim posttion.

A: I haven’t talked to haanyone.

Q: I think the question about the disparity–what is the cause of the disparity in AP CLASSES, and how do we get more educated black stduents in there.

A: We have to satrt in elementary–I wasnt to reduced class sizes to 15-18 students in K-3. We’ll save money on alternative programs, becasue students will learn to read and do math. One middle-school prinicpal told me recently she we eleimnating regular classes– that all her classes would beAP classes . We hve to have high expectations, to expect that our students can learn.

Q: Good teachers prodcued good students–how do you produce good teachres?

A: We have to start somewhere–I have to say we start in the elementary grades.

Q: You’ve seen superintendents come and go–is it unusual to buy out a contract?

A: It’s done in school systems, and in other areas.

q: You said there’ division on the board. Can we trust the board to come together for the good of our children? I address that toyou, and to Miss Fox, who’s on the board.

A: I can only speak for Katherine. I’m willing to work with everyone on the board.

{Arkansawyer} And that’s a wrap. I’ll neaten this up later, and try t o link to the text of Dr. Mitchell’s statement, if available–don’t expect that I got it perfectly right.

June 26, 2007

Live-ish Blogging: Little Rock Science Cafe

Filed under: Arkansas, Science — John A Arkansawyer @ 6:57 pm

I don’t know how live this will be, but I’m going to take another shot at live blogging tonight.

{Arkansawyer} One organization I never got into this post but which was mentioned frequently as helping various missions of the zoo was the Department of Arkansas Heritage. Since I didn’t get them in their proper place, here they are, right up top.

The event is the Little Rock Science Cafe, and tonight’s topic is Zoos - Crucial Conservation and Matchmaking.

The person who is throwing this shindig is Linda Williams, whose day job is biomedical research and whose night job is writing on science and technology. I am, of course, jealous.

The panelists are, from left to right, Mark Shaw, Mike Blakely, and John Bush. The moderator is Dorothy Miles.

Okay, we’re rolling. It’s a relatively small crowd tonight–I gather there are some conflicting events in the natural world. Linda Williams introduced the Science Cafe and said a bit about its background. Dorothy Miles is introduing the panelists. First up is Mark Shaw, whose family, we now know, has hermit crabs among their pets–that’s just so cool! He’ll be talking about aninmal management.

Mark Shaw: The Little Rock Zoo wants to be (and is) accredited by the AZA (the Association of Zoos and Aquariums), which sends accreditation teams out to institutions. It’s both an accreditation investigation and a teaching experience.

The LIttle Rock Zoo has 320 different species. It’s considered a medium-sized zoo. There is a program it uses, ISIS (the International Species Information System). It’s a means of cataloging animals across various zoos and other organizations. At the zoo, there are graphics marking various aspects of the animals, among them an SSP mark from the Species Survival Plan Program, which focuses on endangered species–it’s sort of a computer dating service for endangered animals, and also includes instructional content for zoo staff. Species in this program are marked with a large rhino and a small rhino with it There is a species coordinator for each of the animals in the SSP–sadly, there isn’t enough funding for all species. (At the Little Rock Zoo, Mark Shaw is working with raptors and penguins in the SSP.) One additional point of interest is that the SSP enables small institutions capable of managing a species, but which might not be able to purchase animals from those species–it takes the price tag off the species.

A question from the audience: What sort of penguins are you getting?

Answer: African penguins.

Mike Blakely adds: There has been a dramtic change in the practice of zoos, from competitive to cooperative.

Another question: How is the Audubon Zoo in New Orleans recovering?

The Aquarium of the Americas was hard-hit. The Endangered Species program came through a bit better. Various institutions have been donating animals and resources.

Mike Blakely adds: The Audubon Zoo was in an area that came through well. The Aquarium of the Americas was devastated, due primarily to power failures and secondarily to neighborhood conditions. There was a broad effort to help these institutions–the Aquarium of the Americas has reopened on a limited basis.

Question: A primate house that was devastated by fire–I didn’t catch which one–how’s it doing?

Mike Blakely says it’s been rebuilt, and radically redesigned. Zoos throughout the country have redone their fire programs, including Little Rock’s zoo.

Question: Are you doing much with DNA tracking of individuals?

No, we’re mostly working with leg banding, implanted microchips, and so on.

The next introduction is Dr. John Bush, chair of biology at UALR. He has a background and a passion for both genetics and wildlife. He grew up in an academic family–lucky man! He’d like to say a word about slime molds–his dissertation topic–Dictyostelium dicoideum. He anticipated my question–this slime mold does the thing where the organisms going together, make spores, and then disperse. See dictyBase for more.

Dr. Bush is talking about conservation genetics, with a side trip into the ethics of DNA testing, and about cryptic species–for instance, tarantulas. There may be a cryptic species or sub-species of tarantulas–a species that’s difficult to detect and possibly is quite rare.

Dr. Miles: What species are being targeted initially?

Dr. Bush: Probably those which will bring people into zoos–more likely the cheetahs than the nematodes and the slime molds–but it’s important to save all those, too–who knows what potential for medicine or other advances might be in one of these species? There’s a whole new profession of bio-prospecting–but who owns, say, a baterium taken from an Arkansas hot spring?

Question–I missed it, but it had to do with genotyping of forests, and (I think) factory tree farming, as well as tissue sampling.

Mike Blakely mentions cryozoos and artificial insemination programs, but adds that DNA sampling and cloning techniques are supplanting those.

Dr. Bush: What about the world?

Mike Blakely: Remember, this is a global effort. The US probably has the best zoos, but the Europeans do some things we can’t, and the Asian and Australian zoos are developing very quickly. Zoos don’t tell their stories enough, and the AZA is helping us to tell that story, to justify our existence.

The last intro is Mike Blakely, under whose leadership the Little Rock Zoo received AZA accreditation.

We do want people to have fun at zoos, to be entertained. There are other purposes, though–conservation and research. We in Little Rock are participating in a species survival plan for elephants–we have a surplus of elephants, and we donate blood from them. They’re also an old population, and we’re studying how to help them (he didn’t say pachydermagerontology, but I will). Our fourth purpose is education–especially kids, our target audience. We’d like to help educate and influence them about nature and conservation. For instance, there’s a program where people can be hoisted to the top of a vermillion tree and pick a leaf–a leaf which could be used in cancer research. You can tell a kid about vermillion trees, but picking that leaf, that makes an impact.

The Little Rock Zoo had been through some hard times, but through a community effort, it was brought back. The Zoo’s board, staff, and volunteers helped carry the Zoo through times of low city support. The Zoo is now its own agency, not part of Parks and Recreation. The 2003 bond election also allowed many new projects.

There are three kinds of zoos. One kind has each animal in its own place. The second is a biome zoo, where animals from (for instance) the desert, or the rain forest, are placed together. The third is the zoogeographic zoo, Little Rock’s model–there’ll be an African area, a South American area, a North American area, which will be an Arkansas area. In our African area, for instance, there might be a poacher’s camp. Our first reaction to an elephant poacher is, “He’s a bad man.” But from his point of view, his family has been harvesting elephants for generations. It’s how they survive. Now, mechanized armies are destroying entire herds of elephants–he took one or two elephants a year, and now there are none with ivory to take. He just wants to feed his family. In parts of Africa, such people–for instance, the Masai–are being helped to support themselves via maintaining the elephants rather than killing them.

When he first started in zookeeping, he thought there would be a whole generation of kids who would just insist on conservation, but that hasn’t happened. That’s now a focus of what he’s doing in zookeeping.

Dr. Miles: What you’re describing sounds like a huge shift from my experience with zoos as a child. What’s driving this shift?

Mike Blakely: The AZA is part of it. Another thing is PETA. They’re an adversarial group, and they oppose zoos. I don’t. But they’ve made us become different and better organizations. Another thing: We cannot make money from conservation of endangered species. To bring the into the country, we have to prove we’re doing it for conservation. There’s been a change in the community, but also in staffing. Zoos are becoming more professionally staffed. Plus, it’s fun. It’s more fun to walk through a rain forest than to walk past cages. It makes people happy and excited, and it gives people a whole differnt view about education.

Question: Are you working with reintroducing species such eagles into the habitat?

Mark Shaw: Our eagles at the zoo are injured, and not able to breed. Other institutions are doing this. For instance, there’s a problem with amphibians, and we’re looking into getting involved in this, with toads, frogs, turtles, and other reptiles.

Mike Blakely: You do realize that half the reptiles in the world will be gone in a few years from this fungal infestation. Our zoo will probably have several, three or four, that we’ll work with, in conjunction with other zoos–we can’t do it by ourselves, because a disaster could happen to one zoo and destroy that species.

Question: We have box turtles in our back yard nesting. What do we do with them We don’t really want a bunch of them.

Mike Blakely: One they’ve hatched, you can take them into almost any habitat and release them. The need some protection until they’re hatched. There are rehab facilities which will take them.

Mark Shaw: The bald eagle is doing well, but we don’t want to take them off the endangered species list, because that protects their habitats.

Mike Blakely: We don’t tell people what to do. We try to tell the story. For instance, in Oregon, we had major funding from the timber industry. We told people the two competing stories: Don’t touch the old-growth forests at all, and Go ahead and but them all down. We try to present those stories rather than tell people what to think. We do ask people things like, What are you willing to pay, or to sacrifice, in order to conserve something. What changes are you willing to make?

Question: How far back can we go in trying to sequence ancient DNA?

Dr. Bush: They’re going very far back, not just DNA, but proteins and collagens that may last longer, which can give us some information, if not genetic sequencing. There is the problem in cloning of “old DNA”, where the telomeres appear to be from very old animals.

Question: What about diseases passing from animals to humans, and vice versa?

Dr. Bush: There have been some times when hoof and mouth were thought to be spread in petting zoos, and we took strong precautions. This was more a problem with traveling petting zoos, which have lower standards generally. In accredited zoos, we do have quarantines. If necessary, we would close zoos. Something like this might change zoos permanently. There was also an outbreak of salmonella from komodo dragons. People can also pass diseases to animals, especially to primates.

Question: What is the role of zoos in the overall conservation universe? One kind of public health is restaurant inspections, another is emergency rooms. Zoos seem to me like emergency rooms.

Mike Blakely: I hope we’re more than emergency rooms. We’re mandated to do field work with animals. We education people–you will not become as interested in conservation just by watching animals. In particular, we want to teach children to value conservation. One issue we haven’t touched is habitat preservation–zoos have a role to play in that. How can you get excited about the Gobi Desert? Well, what if you have an exhibit of camels. Now, the largest population of camels right now is feral camels in Australia, which are destroying habitat for native species. How do you tell that story? How can we in Little Rock say we have a good environment for our African elephants? We believe we do, but we have to tell the story with those elephants of their habitat. One proposal is to make part of Ray Winder look like an abandoned teak logging camp populated by elephants.

Follow-up question: One thing that captive breeding does is keep you from having to take more animals out of the wild, if you breed carefully.

Mike Blakely: Yes, that’s a serious issue, and that’s part of the SSP and ISIS program. We’re trying to maintain that population with 90% diversity for two hundred years. By then, we should have some place to put them. If not, then we should be able to do it for another two hundred years. Cryozoos work well with cows, but there’s a lot of money in cows. Not so much with cheetahs.

Dr. Bush: I think the technology for genetic preservation is coming, and I think it’ll be cheap. For instance, I think we’ll be able to engineer fungal immunity into those nematodes. But is it ethical to do that?

Question: I missed this one–it was about the elephants, and involved a confidentiality agreement.

Question: what about a microbiological zoo?

Dr. Bush: I saw one of those at the Washington Zoo.

Mike Blakely: You show kids anything involving, say bacteria in fecal matter, and they’re hooked.

Question: What about STEM education–this strikes me as something to show kids really interesting careers in, for instance, building zoos.

Mike Blakely: Yes. You get all the people who want to work in the zoo. Everyone wants to work with baby elephants. Well, you’ll actually be bringing in food and taking it back out in another form. But we also need accountants, mechanics, horticulturalists, fundraisers–any career can be a zoo career. Lawyers–lawyers are working with ethical questions about zoos. They keep me on the straight and narrow, and I appreciate that. What about the frogs? That’s an ethical question, and it may be a legal question.

Question: What does the word docent really mean?

Mark Bush: It’s a Latin word for teacher, and it’s a volunteer position where people, after training, can impart knowledge about zoos to visitors.

Mike Blakely: We get asked, “Can I get an ocelot for a pet?” Well, a house cat is about as close to a wildcat as you can get. Now, our cheetah exhibition has an explanation of cheetah habitats. One of our people went to Turkey and brought back and trained Anatolian sheepdogs. In Namibia, farmers shoot cheetahs because they kill their animals. Those sheepdogs were raised to protect those animals so they wouldn’t have to be shot. Kids could come into our cheetah area and pet those Anatolian sheepdogs.

Mike Blakely: The Arkansas Zoological Society is fundraising for us. We’re working on our savannah exhibit. The penguin habitat should be up in early 2009–it took time finding an architect for that. The cheeetahs we may sneak in around the end of 2008–that won’t be very expensive. The Arkansas homestead will be coming too. Some of this is contingent on what happens with Ray Winder Field–that’s not under our control.

Question: We had a bat in our garage recently–what’s their habitat? What should we do about them?

Mike Blakely: Just leave the window open. And did you notice how quiet they are? The danger of rabies is quite overrated, but we do recommend that you try not to come in contact with them. You can shoo them out with pillowcases and such. We’ve got bat boxes installed in places–they eat mosquitos, and you are so lucky to have them. You could try hanging bat boxes and providing them some habitat–there are plans at the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission or you can contact us at the zoo.

{Arkansawyer} Well, that was fun–I’ll get pictures up later, if any of them are any good.

Little Rock Science Cafe: June 26th

Filed under: Uncategorized — John A Arkansawyer @ 12:22 am

Tonight, I’ll be at the Little Rock Science Cafe. here’s the scoop:

June 2007 Zoos - Crucial Conservation and Matchmaking

Tuesday, June 26, 2007 from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm, at Sufficient Grounds Coffeehouse, 722 North Palm off Kavanaugh in the Heights.

Panelists

  • Mike Blakely – Director of the Little Rock Zoo; Little Rock, AR
  • Mark Shaw - Curator of the Little Rock Zoo; Little Rock, AR
  • John Bush, PhD - Department of Biology, University of Little Rock, Little Rock, AR

Moderator

  • Dorothy Miles, Ph.D., Research associate with UAMS/Arkansas Cancer Research Center; news anchor/reporter for KUAR FM89

Free and open to the public. No registration needed, but seating and handicap access is limited.

If you see me, say hello. I won’t be in Tangier.

June 25, 2007

Who Is “Lefty”, And Why Is He Blogging?

Filed under: Uncategorized — John A Arkansawyer @ 10:58 pm

You might notice the little button on the left (where else?), and the Arkansas-related newsfeed below it. That’s part of an interesting effort to aggregate (what else?) lefty blogs.

I don’t know whether I qualify, but at least I didn’t lie on my application, so let’s see whether they add me.

Here’s what they’re all about:

Here at LeftyBlogs, we’re building the one place you can go to stay on top of all the latest action alerts, news, gossip, and important info that every progressive activist needs.

I really like this idea. I’m still skeptical that any single blog can scale up to the mass national level, as a community. At the state and local level, though, I’ve got no doubt it can be done.

On the off-chance that you might be interested in this project, here are the criteria for being added:

This blog is mostly about politics.
This blog mostly contains local and state content.
This blog has been live for more than two months.
This blog is more-or-less progressive, liberal, Democratic, or lefty.
I have verified that [my] RSS feed…actually works.

Important: We often approve blogs that don’t meet all five requirements perfectly. But, if you lie, we will reject your blog. So don’t even try it.

I’m hopeful they’ll add me. Granted, this blog has only been around a little while, but the one before went over two years.

Powered by WordPress